This continues "Gustav Mahler — Symphony No.3 (Part 1)"
Mahler wrote his Third Symphony in the summers of 1895 and 1896—having become the ‘summer composer’ only two years before, while finishing the Second Symphony. Unwilling to see himself only as a conductor and opera director rather than a composer, he compared himself to what the great composers before him had achieved at his age (then about 35), and realized that he needed to get cracking.
The Third wasn’t premiered until after the Fourth—1902 in Krefeld at the 38th annual festival of the Allgemeiner Deutscher Musikverein (the General German Music Association founded by Franz Liszt to promote the “New German School” of music). For one, it is even more unwieldy than the Second Symphony before. And the Berlin critics had called Mahler a lunatic, after hearing three excerpted movements a few years earlier, which might not have helped, either. The work is scored for quadruple-everything: flutes, oboes, bassoons, trumpets, trombones and five clarinets, eight horns, two harps, a huge percussion section, alto soloist, women’s choir, boys’ choir, and more strings than most orchestras could muster. The final Adagio alone, never mind the massive 35 minute first movement, is longer than most Haydn symphonies.
It also took so long to get the Third Symphony premiered, because this time around Mahler was not making any compromises. The premiere had to be perfect, or not take place at all. He had to conduct, and he had to get as much rehearsal time as necessary. He wrote Richard Strauss, who, in his position as head of the Allgemeiner Deutscher Musikverein organized the concert and overcame any and all doubts (Mahler’s Fourth had flopped, too), material and financial obstacles to get Mahler whatever he needed.
When it finally was mounted, under the critical and intrigued eyes and ears of his colleagues (apart from Strauss, there were, among others, Eugen D’Albert, Leo Blech, Hermann Bischoff, Max Reger, Felix Weingartner and Hugo Wolf), the whole symphony was a—literally, one might add—smashing, popular success. The orchestra, having overcome its skepticism about this newfangled music, ended up exceeding Mahler’s expectations, and he liked the trombonist so much, he poached him for his Vienna Opera Orchestra.
Symphony No.3, C.Abbado / BPh DG |
One recording I might esteem even more than Pierre Boulez’ (see Part 1) is Claudio Abbado’s recording from Berlin (DG). After the Seventh, this is surely his best (audio) recording from what might have become a new, live cycle-in-the-making with Berlin, had the Lucerne recordings not superseded it. Atmosphere in spades, warm, passionate playing and conducting, a mezzo with low notes to die for in Anna Larsson (altogether a much earthier animal than von Otter): it is abundantly clear by the end of this performance why the Berlin audience sits in stunned awe before it dare starts applauding. One of the most regularly amusing CD critics has called this a “dismal, wretchedly recorded (live) approximation of Mahler's Third Symphony”, which should not really keep you from exploring it.
Symphony No.3, E.P.Salonen / LAPhil Sony UK | DE | FR Symphony No.3, R.Kubelik / BRSO Audite UK | DE | FR |
Symphony No.3, Z.Mehta / LAPhil Decca UK | DE | FR |
Symphony No.3, M.Tilson Thomas/ SFS SFS Media UK | DE | FR |
Symphony No.3, B.Haitink / CSO CSO Resound UK | DE | FR Symphony No.3, D.Zinman / Zurich TO RCA UK | DE | FR |
Instead I’d chose David Zinman’s Zurich recording (RCA ,); the best from his cycle, so far. Both Haitink and Zinman take an understated approach, but the soft hues that elsewhere hamper Zinman’s Mahler from taking off are applied to greatly moving effect here. His soloist Birgit Remmert is a little dusky, a good fit to the plangent English horn of Martin Frutiger. A symphony with a finale like the Third does not need to be performed-to-impress to bring out the desired, awed effect. [Edit: A strong newcomer is also Markus Stenz / Gürzenich / Michael Schuster, (Oehms,), which shall get a more detailed review sometime in the future.)
There are older recordings that are much admired, too. They are not included because they cannot honestly compete with newer, better sounding versions. Rarity and nostalgia have made of a very good interpretation like Horenstein’s, for example, a mythical one. And while any of Mitropoulos’ Mahler should be worth hearing, the only currently available Third, from New York, in English, savagely cut, and in a scrappy performance, is not.
Mahler 3 Choices
1. Claudio Abbado, BPh, DG
2. Pierre Boulez, WPh, DG
3. Michael Tilson Thomas, SFS, SFSMedia
4. Esa Pekka Salonen, LA Phil, Sony
5. Rafael Kubelik, BRSO, Audite
5. Mehta, LA Phil, Decca
Mahler 3 SACD Choices
Michael Tilson Thomas, SFS, SFSMedia
David Zinman, Zurich TO, RCA
Find a list of the ex-WETA Mahler Posts here: http://ionarts.blogspot.com/2009/12/mahler-survey.html
Discographies on ionarts: Bach Organ Cycles | Beethoven Piano Sonata Cycles I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX | Beethoven Symphony Cycles Index | Beethoven String Quartet Cycles | Bruckner Symphony Cycles | Dvořák Symphony Cycles | Shostakovich Symphony Cycles | Shostakovich String Quartet Cycles | Sibelius Symphony Cycles | Mozart Keyboard Sonata Cycles | Vaughan Williams Symphony Cycles