Opening with Prokofiev's Three Pieces from Romeo and Juliet, op. 75, Kissin captured Juliet's flightiness in restless runs, the wild romp of Mercutio's Queen Mab speech, and the heavy-footed dance of the Montagues and Capulets, orchestral in scope and marvelously differentiated in voicing. That was a pleasing overture to the meat of this recital, an unforgettable performance of Prokofiev's eighth sonata (B-flat major, op. 84). From the opening note of the first movement (Andante dolce), which Kissin set gently and sweetly in place with such deliberate care, this was a display of patient craftsmanship, alternately elegiac and then restive in the inquieto sections. The piece has never much appealed to me, by comparison to the flashier Prokofiev sonatas (no. 2, no. 7), but Kissin's case was persuasive, giving the second movement (Andante sognando) the feel of someone fallen asleep outside a dance hall, with chromatic chord alterations soft-pedaled and Kissin's velvety touch making time seem to stand still. Finally, the third movement (Vivace) was an outrageous toccata that rumbled with trumpet-like fanfares through to its booming conclusion.
Anne Midgette, Kissin Is Dexterous but Lacking in Emotion (Washington Post, March 3) John von Rhein, Evgeny Kissin, wunderkind no longer, brings mature insights to Chopin and Prokofiev (Chicago Tribune, February 24) |
As if the first half were not enough of an indication that Kissin should record more of the Prokofiev solo literature, he focused on Prokofiev in his three encores. (After hearing eight encores in 2007, one could not help feeling a little disappointed.) After a fluid, expansive Chopin nocturne (op. 27, no. 2) Kissin brought down the house with two Prokofiev selections, Devilish Inspiration, Op. 4, No. 4 and the March from Love for Three Oranges. Both were hard-fingered heart-stoppers, just the way this kind of Prokofiev works best.
Compare Russian pianists with the next concert from WPAS, a recital by Olga Kern at Strathmore (March 22, 4 pm).
Charles: I think the etude you meant, when you reported the audience's unexpected applause, was Opus 10, No. 4. I don't think Kissin was flustered at all. In fact, I suspect he was pleased. He had just matched the tempo in Richter's legendary performance of the piece.(You can find it on YouTube-- it's from Monsaingeon's "Richter: The Enigma.") In fact, Kissin may have surpassed Richter's performance. It was indeed, as you say, astounding.
ReplyDeleteYours,
Steve Wigler
Steve -- Quite right, not no. 12, which is the Revolutionary, but no. 4. Sorry for the confusion.
ReplyDeleteI did not mean to imply flustered in a way that impacted his performance, which I don't think the applause did. Only that it upset the order. He seemed to want to continue right into the op. 25 etudes after the Revolutionary, as if one break for applause were enough.
Thanks for the Richter note -- a very good point indeed.
It's amazing: when I heard Evgeny Kissin playing the same program at the Lucerne Festival, we exactly did the same, applaud after Chopin op.10 n°4! As if we could no longer wait to express our gratitude and admiration.
ReplyDeleteNow that I remember the performance by reading your review, I really wish I could hear it again. At the Verbier Festival, perhaps? ;o)