Stravinsky, Sy. of Psalms, Sy. in C, Sy. in Three Movements, Berlin Philharmonic, S. Rattle (released July 8, 2008) EMI Classics 50999 2 076330 0 8 |
Stravinsky was drawn to the psalms ostensibly because of his recent reconversion to the Orthodox Christianity of his upbringing. Somewhat strangely, he chose to set not Russian liturgical texts, but sections of three psalms in the Latin Vulgate translation. The work has a unique sound because Stravinsky uses an unusual palette, omitting violins, violas, and clarinets and calling for large numbers of others (5 flutes, 4 oboes, 3 bassoons, 4 trumpets). Furthermore, Stravinsky wanted children's voices on the upper choral parts but allowed for women's voices instead, which is what is found here in the Rundfunkchor Berlin. In all three symphonies, Rattle focuses on the activity of intersecting rhythms, in a reading that is viscerally exciting.
Although there are at least two previous recordings by the Berlin Phil (conducted by Boulez and Karajan), this is the only one to combine the Symphony of Psalms with the two other best symphonies of Stravinsky. My least favorite is the Symphony in C, commissioned by the Chicago Symphony Orchestra in 1940. In an EMI promotional video, Rattle notes that the Berliners had not played the work since the 1980s, and the intensive rehearsals he describes produce a taut, somewhat agitated performance. The piece that pleases the most is the Symphony in Three Movements, commissioned by the New York Philharmonic in 1946. It is a work I do not know all that well, but Rattle's reading is so alluring, with verve and lightness in first movement's jagged rhythms, and suavity in the luscious slow movement. Am I the only one to hear Copland's influence in the introduction to the third movement?
75'39"
"Am I the only one to hear Copland's influence in the introduction to the third movement?"
ReplyDeleteNope -- I've often thought the same thing, and I'm glad to find I'm not the only one!