Philip Glass, portrait by Chuck Close (left) and recent photograph (right) -- see the exhibit of Chuck Close portraits of Philip Glass in the Met lobby |
As a result, the recently opened production of Philip Glass's Satyagraha was a cause for celebration, and critics descended from far and wide for opening night last week (including Washington's own Tim Page, who spoke eloquently on the Sirius broadcast) to witness the Met turning this important page (next season will have Adams's Doctor Atomic, reportedly with The Ghosts of Versailles and Golijov's new Daedalus to follow). Ionarts was able to get there for the third performance of the run, Saturday's matinee.
The Met's first
Satyagraha, Metropolitan Opera, 2008, photo by Ken Howard |
Ronald Blum, Glass' 'Satyagraha' Reaches Met (Associated Press, April 13) Anne Midgette, 'Satyagraha': Simplicity & Splendor in the Glass (Washington Post, April 14) Anthony Tommasini, Fanciful Visions on the Mahatma’s Road to Truth and Simplicity (New York Times, April 14) Daniel J. Wakin, Puppets enliven Metropolitan production of opera 'Satyagraha' (International Herald Tribune, April 14) Jeremy Eichler, Gandhi at the Met, Glass in transition (Boston Globe, April 14) Mark Swed, Live: 'Satyagraha' (Los Angeles Times, April 14) Patrick Cole, Selling Gandhi, Glass: `Satyagraha' Uses Posters, Yoga Teachers (Bloomberg News, April 16) Tim Smith, Glass' hypnotic opera at Met (Baltimore Sun, April 17) Vibhuti Patel, Gandhi’s Wonder Years (Newsweek, April 17) Heidi Waleson, History and Hypnotic Magic (Wall Street Journal, April 19) Karren L. Alenier, Satyagraha (Culture Vulture, April 20) Matt Blank and Stephen Kent, Satyagraha: Can Opera Help Fight Climate Change? (Playbill Arts, April 3) Elena Park, Metropolitan Opera: The Force of Truth (Playbill Arts, April 11) ---, Philip Glass: The Message in the Music (Playbill Arts, April 21) David Cote, Puppet Regime (Opera News, April 2008) |
All members of the supporting cast are to be congratulated for surviving the score's grueling demands, especially soprano Rachelle Durkin (Miss Schlesen) who sang so many high notes again and again (not always right where they needed to be, but still), it was hard to keep track. Of the quartet that often sings together, baritone Earle Patriarco (Mr. Kallenbach) was the most consistently impressive. As Parsi Rustomiji, bass-baritone Alfred Walker was too easily covered by other sounds when he was anywhere but near the apron. Mezzo-soprano Mary Phillips had a grand presence as Mrs. Alexander, the wife of the regional governor, who protects Gandhi with her umbrella. Phelim McDermott's direction emphasized statis, sapping all of the personality from the characters, as they mostly stood in place or walked in slow motion with no impetus or direction.
The production, which comes to New York from English National Opera, is beautiful, monumental, and puzzling. Julian Crouch's set is a raked stage surrounded by a ring wall of nondescript color, and the largely monochromatic costumes designed by Kevin Pollard follow the course of Glass's score, towards a more and more austere set of colors. Thankfully, an element of whimsy and menace was added by the puppeteers and supernumeraries of the Improbable Theatre Company, the only thing that saved Glass's ponderous, philosophical opera from its own sententious seriousness. Most of the evening's visual souvenirs involved the puppeteers, creating a halo for Richard Bernstein's Lord Krishna, crumpling newspapers to form heads and limbs, flying on wires, manipulating the over-sized capitalist goons behind the Ha-Ha chorus in Act II and the giant bird puppet, and unrolling undulating bands of packing tape across the stage.
Satyagraha, Metropolitan Opera, 2008, photo by Ken Howard
Eventually, one gives up caring about the words being sung, as the text just flows over the listener (in spite of the beautifully realized projections). Someone should make a video like the Carmina Burana with alternate lyrics, with the Sanskrit of Satyagraha replaced with nonsense (beginning with "Raja, naba do wa, gola wookie, nipple pinchie?," the gibberish spoken by Jaba the Peter in Family Guy). This Buddhistic relinquishing of conscious comprehension is likely part of Glass's strategy in the third act, where he prolongs the plainest music (all those endless unison string arpeggios!) to separate the listener from harmonic expectations. That austerity sets up the memorable conclusion, with Gandhi repeatedly intoning that ascending phrygian scale (heard earlier, in the flute, in the first act) over more complex orchestral textures that blossom in the final bars.
The production of Satyagraha, which is an event not to be missed, continues for four more performances (April 22, 25, 28, and May 1), at the Metropolitan Opera in New York.
cool set designs.
ReplyDeleteYou might get a kick out of reading Larry Collins and Dominique Lapierre's Freedom at Midnight, which is a brief history of the Indian independence movement from about the time of Gandhi's move from South Africa, to the day India became a sovereign republic. Make sure to get the new version - it's a pretty quick read, perhaps a pre-cursor to the pop-history we see around on bookshelves these days.
ReplyDeleteI don't have any interesting opinions on Glass' operas, but that Carmina Burana link is hilarious.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the reading suggestion, Varun, which I am always happy to receive. And thanks for the other comments, too.
ReplyDeleteI think this is actually the Met's 3rd Glass event, if one counts EOTB. The second was Voyage: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE2DD123AF937A25753C1A964958260
ReplyDeleteQuite so, Doug. Terrible oversight on my part. Correction noted.
ReplyDeleteWhat do you think are the negative effects of the HD broadcasts? Maybe you've blogged on this already, but, if so, a link?
ReplyDeleteThanks for the question, Michael. Not sure that I have written anywhere about this, at least more than a line or two.
ReplyDeleteThe carping you hear from opera nuts about the HD broadcasts is that the medium of video may end up driving the casting at the Met. That is, the singer with the best voice may not be suited at all, physically, to the high-definition closeup.
Furthermore, the medium of video has little to do at all with opera and what makes it enjoyable. For all the great things about the HD broadcasts, opera is not meant to be viewed or heard in closeup (at least the sort that is on the roster at the Met, that is). Is it really going to attract a new audience to buy seats and sit in the theater? Has television broadcasting done much to encourage people to attend plays in the theater?
Don't get me wrong. I am thrilled to see the Met make money on the HD venture, and I am all for making opera available to a wider audience. But it is too easy to see it only for its positives.