Hélène Grimaud and the Schumanns
Available at Amazon: Hélène Grimaud, Reflection, Truls Mørk, Anne Sofie von Otter (released on September 12, 2006) |
Hélène Grimaud Box Set |
Technically, Grimaud is a gifted player certainly, although not to mind-blowing proportions. What seems to please many listeners, myself included, is the individuality of her interpretation. All those strong ideas, which also come out in her politics and writing, lead her toward a sometimes unpredictable way of playing. That can be an exciting thing to hear from a purely solo player, but this CD is an anthology dominated by collaborative performances. In a sense when Grimaud is the soloist in a concerto, it is up to the orchestra to stay with her, but the role is reversed in the next two selections.
Accompanying is not a skill that comes naturally to all pianists, and the three brief tracks here, songs by Clara Schumann with mezzo-soprano Anne Sofie von Otter, do not reveal Grimaud as a natural accompanist. She has a passionate sense of rubato, which leads her to make the introduction and brief interludes of Er ist gekommen (op. 12, no. 2) very turbulent. It's appropriately Romantic (Friedrich Rückert's poem is about a man who arrives "in storm and rain" to take the narrator's heart), but I cannot help but think that a singer would get kind of nervous listening to that sound while negotiating an entrance. Indeed, von Otter's voice has a jittery edge to it in this song. The third song, Am Strande (Wilhelm Gerhard's adaptation of a Robert Burns poem), is much the same. Happily, Grimaud's other strength, direct simplicity, is just what is needed for the second Rückert song, Warum willst du and're fragen, in which we seem to hear the calm, steadying voice of Clara Schumann in her husband's ears ("Do not believe strangers, / do not believe your own delusions; / nor should you interpret my actions, / but rather look at my eyes").
The best collaborative performance on this CD is with Truls Mørk, on the first Brahms cello
Grimaud can and does cut loose in these pieces, giving collar-poppingly uninhibited performances that one might not associate with Brahms but which are likely to quicken your pulse. (These pieces are marked "Agitato" and "Molto passionato," after all.) The second op. 79 rhapsody (G minor) is one of the most entertaining Brahms pieces to play at the piano, with its sweeping melodies and booming bass octaves. Grimaud stretches the tempo until it nearly breaks, both fast and slow, the former perhaps a tad in violation of Brahms's tempo modification ("ma non troppo allegro"). She does so not without a few smudged notes due to the precipitous pacing. Still, minor quibbles aside, this is satisfying playing.
Deutsche Grammophon 477 5719
For those in the area, Hélène Grimaud will play a recital this Sunday (November 5, 5:30 pm) at Shriver Hall in Baltimore. Her program will include the two Brahms rhapsodies recorded on this disc, as well as selections from her 2005 disc, the Chopin berceuse and barcarolle and Rachmaninov's second sonata. Her program opens with Busoni's arrangement of the Bach D minor chaconne.
6 comments:
Here she plays with the Staatskapelle Dresden, the modern orchestra descended from the group that premiered Schumann's concerto, the Dresden Hofkapelle
450 uninterrupted years of existence as an orchestra makes the Staatskapelle one of the oldest orchestras in the world; even the title "Staatskapelle", as opposed to "Hofkapelle", dates back to the late 1850s.
Apart from the fact that the players are not 450 years old, what makes the Staatskapelle a 'modern orchestra'?
Jens, I did not mean to disparage what is, I certainly agree, one of the most venerable musical institutions in the world. I only meant to specify that the duties and function of that orchestra are different from what they were in 1548 and even in 1845. That's all. Surely, the range of personnel now on their payroll and the sort of career they lead must be different these days? (My understanding was that the name Staatskapelle was a change made after World War I.) They do not wear livery anymore, and they play principally for a ticket-buying public. Their union is probably also somewhat stronger.
well... by that standard, every orchestra is a modern descendent of its past self. and apart from the name-adjustment, i was wondering what made the DS different that it needed specifying that its 'not the same orchestra' -- when for all practical purposes, it *has* been the same orchestra. i just thought it leans toward suggesting a lack of continuity, which isn't the case. (No disassembly during or after the wars etc.)
jfl
Jens, you are right about the impressive continuity of that institution. I should not have implied any discontinuity there. Apologies!
just nitpicking :)
Terry, yes, typo. Thanks!
Post a Comment