Instead, my real reason for writing is unbelievable imagery of a different nature. While driving my daughter to and from school, I get to share the most incredible sunrises with her in the morning, and fantastic sunsets in the afternoon: wonderful billowing cloud formations, supported by deep blues, purples, and magenta, topped by wild oranges and screaming yellows. If one were to paint an imaginary landscape, would we ever think of using these combinations of color? What is the true meaning of natural? Nature is everything, and "natural" is only a limitation of our imagination. Perhaps we should be forgiving when a friend wears a striped shirt with plaid pants. The natural world is constantly showing any combination has possibilities: it's not always a harmonic coexistence.
Claude Monet (Vétheuil, Setting Sun, 1901, Musée d'Orsay) and Vincent Van Gogh (The Starry Night, Saint-Rémy, 1889, Museum of Modern Art) come to mind first as painters who were known for pushing the color, which led to the Fauve group of artists (for example, Maurice de Vlaminck, The Blue House, 1906, Minneapolis Institute of Arts), and so on, to artists working today, such as Paul Resika or Helen Frankenthaler. This doesn't even scratch the surface, since I'm only mentioning Western European art because of time restraints (I have to get back to painting): there are so many cultural interpretations, African, Asian, Latino, and Native-American, forever influencing the way we see the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment